At the center of my understanding of science is a belief quite different from the main stream theories accepted today. I don't subscribe to the "wavicles" theory or the arbitrary assignment of wave or particle physics to atoms dictated by photons.
But, I do subscribe to the electron shell energy match and mismatch concept. It explains more and has more interesting magic. Plus if God is real and created everything... atoms, planets, and a common mathematical theme... well, I'll vote for that one.
This "Electron Shell Energy Potential" (ESEP) explains things like surface tension on water. It also explains how water can be manipulated with three forms of energy being namely light, mechanically, and/or magnetically.
Example #1 Using light in the manipulation of electrons in water molecules.
Light also includes heat as heat is infrared light. Adding, heat to water causes the atoms of water to adsorb energy and expand giving way to boiling.
Example #2 Using magnetic waves to manipulate electrons in water molecules.
Bombarding a cup of water in a microwave oven until it boils.
Example #3 Using mechanical means of energizing electrons in water.
Sound is a form of mechanical energy. A man discovered that he could use sound to boil water.
"Boiling water with sound waves? – new invention baffles scientist"
The trick isn't the device used but the frequency generated to act on the electrons of the atoms. And if the statement "new invention baffles scientists" doesn't tell all I don't know what does.
More examples and information:
Let's look at an electrical generator. As a cooper wire is passed through an alternating magnetic field the magnetic field dislodges electrons from the atoms of copper. This dis-lodgement causes current flow in the organized structure of the wire contingent to the frequency of the alternating magnetic field. This produces one type of electrical charge that can be manipulated to do work. I call this "Hot Electrical power (HEp)".
Now, if copper is pounded out flat into plates and an array of alternating magnets are mounted in a disk parallel between the copper plates while being rotated at a reasonable speed, "Cold Electrical power (CEp)" is produced. See "Thermoelectric Effect" for reference.
The two types are completely opposite in nature. HEp when shorted gets hot emitting photons. (electrons are forced into a wire compressing them forcing a slowdown in electron activity requiring the need to emit photons) CEp when shorted gets cold absorbing photons. (electrons are forced apart at the generator requiring energy to balance their movement adsorbing photons) HEp requires connectivity to operate. CEp operates over resistance. Both types can power electromagnetic motors as with electrostatic motors but, HEp requires little adaptation to power an electromagnetic motor and CEp is more effective powering an electrostatic motor.
HEp alone in a circuit is around 65% efficient. CEp is 77% efficient. If the two are combined into one HCEp force the efficiency to all but perfect at 98%. This was actually a RPM reduction measurement under load. As each power source was connected and tested under the same load HEp was the easiest to slowdown followed by CEp and HCEp could not be loaded enough to get a significant speed reduction for fear of torquing the shaft of the motor to failure.
And Here's a Little Ditty
I have stumbled on to an interesting thing about oil and gas. I discovered that oil is not a product of dinosaurs but is generated by the earth in motion. The book Black Gold Stranglehold talks more about this. Also, oil can be made from garbage and sewage. But, the real discovery was that cars are intentionally designed to burn 100s of times too much gas per spark plug ignition. The current ratio is set to 14.7/1 or 14.7 parts air to 1 part gas. At this ratio liquid fuel is dumped into the cylinder such that, at around 10 degrees to top of the compression stroke, when the spark plug fires there is compressed air and liquid fuel in the cylinder. In fact at the spark plug ignition a 6-millisecond spark starts a chain reaction so that at the top of the compression cycle fuel is finally hot enough to start vaporizing in sufficient amounts to continue the explosion over the top sending the piston flying down the cylinder at 120 feet per second. All the while some of the remaining liquid fuel is being vaporized and ignited at 100 feet per second. As the piston rounds the bottom and starts coming up it meets resistance from the still burring fuel until the compression and remaining liquid fuel drown the fire so that the mixture can be sent to the exhaust system. Here some of the now remaining vapor fuel released from cylinder pressure can be oxidized in the catalytic converter which still dumps a lot of HC, CO, CO2, NO, NO2, NO3, SOx and other things into the air.
What a joke the 14.7/1 ratio is. If you take a new 55 gal drum and put 2 drops of gas in it, seal it, and give it a spark you had better be behind a strong wall cause the drum detonates quite powerfully. That’s why it is dangerous to weld near an empty gas tank. (Ask the fire department about car fire dangers.) Now lets look at the 14.7/1 ratios and the 55gal drum. At 14.7 to 1 that’s 4 gallons of gas. If 2 drops blows the drum to pieces violently why do we need 4 gallons in the drum? Here is another question dealing with the compression on an engine. Propane is a HC that as it is compressed turns to a liquid. So, if compression causes propane to become a liquid would not compressing vaporized gasoline cause the same effect. Some of the fuel that did vaporize through the heat of vaporization would be forced back to a liquid state, which is not combustible. So the very nature of the engine raises the question why inject so much gas? Next question, 1 Mol of air fills 22.4 L at 75 degrees. Now an engine runs around 212 degrees. This means the air volume is larger so there are fewer molecules of air drawn into the fixed space of the cylinder. This means even less gas is needed to make the engine work as there is less oxygen to burn it.
So, here comes the rub and it’s a good one. If a person backs off on the gas ratios the engine gets hotter. This is because of the fuel still being a liquid changes to a vapor and continues burning after ignition until extinguished by the fuel that we removed... oops. So 90/1 is dangerous. It will melt the engine. What is a safe mixture? If gasoline is poured on the sidewalk it burns at 200/1 and only the vapor burns causing heat that vaporizes the rest until it’s gone. So we started at 200/1 and advanced the timing to 2 degrees after top. (leaving the timing at 10 degrees before top puts enormous strain on the bearing even to failure) The engine temperature dropped 75 degrees; it was running at 140 degrees and the power was unbelievable. But, thinking back on the first story we eliminated the back pressure on the piston during the exhaust stroke. We only have the 6-millisecond pop that sends the piston down the cylinder. All power no waste. The exhaust was funny also no unburned HC, no CO, and no NO or NO2 or NO3 The engine isn’t hot enough to form these compounds any more. There was a trace of CO2 but far less then any catalytic converter could ever get down to. In order to match the power output of a normal 14.7/1 burn we had to back the fuel off to 700/1. Oh, and the 1 part fuel was measured in a vaporous state compensating for heat and compression.
Plainly the price of gasoline is a joke. Environmentalists are forcing the gas prices up with their inability to do math. Many people look at stoichiometry instead of the thermal dynamics of gasses as to the way an engine works. So, this solution has eluded most people. But, engines work on the expansion of gasses. And the last big kicker, if all the cars were converted, gas and oil prices would tank, environmentalists would be out of work, the air would be cleaner, more people would be addicted to horsepower again, cars would be full size and then some, aerodynamics would mean little so a lot of designers would be out of work, electric cars would prove to be very dirty compared to gas, there would be no real need for advancement in the automotive industry, oil executives would have to pay the workforce a higher percentage of the profits, a lot of support people would loose their jobs as well, motor oil would last longer in the engine (there is no sooty blow by to pollute it), and the biggest problem of all... governments both state and federal would loose tax revenue big time.
Natural gas is advertised to burn clean. Here is one to think on, natural gas is found with crude oil. It is a HC found in a vaporous state over the oil.
A quick update on the gasoline that is sold at the pump. Octane or white gasoline burns cleaner, cheaper, and is more explosive than pump gas (from 200/1 to 700/1). Pump gas is mixed with many other substances containing oxygen (like MTBE) to bring its burn ratio down to 14.7/1. Many of these compounds (and injector cleaners) are designed to dissolve carburetor parts in an attempt to disable older cars as carburetors can be used as fuel vaporizers.
Oil is currently a sudo science used to gain power and money.
