Oh, bummer

 In order to understand this post, you will need to over come the inner lizard brain response.  (Time has past and I see now how this last line could be offensive.   Oh well, I'm leaving it because I'm an INTJ and correct is better then sparing feelings.  Just think of yourself as a doctor.  The people mooning you are just getting shots.)  Next we will need a clear definition of conservatism.  Following this we need an understanding of  "The law of nations or natural law".  And, we will need an example of the law in motion "a poor interpretation of the 14th Amendment.  After setting the foundation we can now develop the problem given to us in 1933.  Which problem has rotted into a fine mess as depicted in "Thrive the Movie".  Now the final note in this cacophony "The CORPORATE state of government".  And for clarity this is how invasive the CORPORATE GOVERNMENT is now.    

First! I am an entrepreneur and I am disappointed that I now have a steeper rock to climb but, Romney would have only slowed the progression to economic disaster not stopped it.  Progressive republicans turning the temperature up slowly on the pot of frogs, may have trapped more of us in socialistic snares like the illegal ratification of the 16th Amendment and the 17th Amendment.  

Conservatives educated with the United States Constitution and nature’s law, not progressives catering to democracy and crossing the isle, would have been more effective during this election. Only the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has a democracy... a lawless corporate democracy. The Constitution of the United States denotes a republic with laws. (Side note; big media is part of the government corporate structure.)

In addition, you have to apply the expensive bread analogy to the people on food stamps. When the price of bread goes up people often buy less of a better bread to get their monies worth. The same is true of the cost of employes. When the cost of employes increases employers weed out all but the best employees for keepers. No one likes buying expensive mediocrity. It doesn’t balance the books.  The best employees can keep up with the extra demand imposed by the new productivity level require to compete.  Good to tolerable employees are just jobless.  Of course, small businesses may have to let go of even the best employees to balance the books.     

So, we should let the mediocre, poor, and less educated starve since they are not prime candidates for the business productivity index. As Obama squeezes his hand more of these types of people will fall from his fingers. Small business people will be some of the first to fall and many have. From talk radio shows lately I find their anger at their own lack of education toward Romney and Romney's lack of a real choice against Obama amusing. Even Rush stated that fewer people turned out for this last election.  This time Obama received 11 million fewer votes  than in 2008 and Romney received 2 million fewer then McCain did in 2008.  McCain had Palin a conservative on the ticket.  Romney was running as "only better then Obama".

I must admit though, I thought that the bankers running the world would have chosen Romney to rebuild more wealth for their taking but, it seems they are more worried about 12/21/2012 or something. Leaving Obama in allows them to push Agenda 21 on us sooner. Basically, Agenda 21 is world depopulation for better management of the remaining people.  P.S. it started with abortions a few years back.

"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive" (Sir Walter Scott)

If we as a people, meaning all of us (black, white, yellow, and red), don't pull our heads out of our posteriors and fight back, Iceland will be the only sovereign nation left.     

I just had an interesting thought.  What if the fear of 12/21/2012 hooked with the money hidden in the governments' (note plural possessive) CAFRs brings an Icelandic response in the United States?

If Romney was more conservative like Reagan he would have been president now.  However, I'm not sure if it would have been the best thing at this time. 

The Cactus Cuties  preforming the national anthem 

Etiquette

Last night I was dreaming about an old client I no longer have.  In the dream I was sitting across a very male decorated lawyer's desk facing the lawyer's secretary.  Apparently, the lawyer had died recently and I was needed to complete some paperwork.  In so doing I had an epiphany and I left the desk for a moment to check my hypothesis.  Upon returning only moments later I was met with scorn. As an INTJ I found myself bewildered at the cold response when I returned.

Apparently, it is poor manners to test an hypothesis while interacting with someone else.  It wasn't until I had cleared my train of thought and dedicated a few seconds to analyzing possible solutions to her reaction did I see a weak correlation between my action and her bewilderment and eventual anger.

Here is the part that worries me.  I know that if I find myself in such a place again I will be blind sided and step into the same trap.  Dream, this time, it was.  However, I know I have provoked such responses in real interactions from people.  I always felt at a loss as to why some people grew so hostile toward me.

I find so little satisfaction from being with others.  I feel compelled to help others even though I find myself mostly met with indifference or hostility.  One of my many sons is an ENFJ.  He is always met with warmth and admiration from others.  I have found it bewildering as he contributes little to actual measurable effort on their behalf.  Even now my mind is contemplating the potential of others to interpret my words into hostile or less then fatherly ambitions.  I am very pleased at my sons abilities... I just don't understand their nuance as I find people like wounded animals lashing out at their caregiver.

There are times I wish I had a different personality type.  I get tired of being scratched and bitten or ignored for finding solutions.  Yesterday, I agreed to talk to a preparedness group about computer safety and security.  I took my ENTJ son with me as he can communicate with people more effectively then I can.  By the end of the meeting the group seemed more comfortable addressing my son then me.  Here again I am amazed at how fluid and honest he was without offending people.  He was talking over their heads and yet he was more acceptable then I was.

I was informed of a new saying in the last few days "If you want to serve you must learn to sell and market".  It seems that all business and service not only revolves around but are "marketing".  I personally don't see this clearly.  I don't buy things from advertising and marketing.  I find such efforts wasted money and TV programming time.  As I have need, I research solutions.  A lot of times the solutions I find are contrary to popular belief.  I don't trust doctors, engineers, politicians, bankers, or lawyers at face value without proof.  A degree is not proof.  Tangible results are proof only to a point.  Sometimes short term results don't manifest a greater problem caused by a solution immediately.  The use of fluoride in toothpaste falls into this group as fluoride causes brittle bones and teeth.  But in the first six month period of exposure it kills bacteria in the mouth slowing tooth decay just to cause bone and tooth failure later.

One of the biggest lies out there now is "genetic disease".  How is this a lie?  I can cause or expound upon a mineral deficiency in the soil and cause a disease.  For instance, make food plants that can metabolize manganese even in the presents of glyphosate.  Now glyphosate binds to manganese rendering it inert so if you eat food (these plants) you will have a manganese deficiency which causes respiratory problems like asthma and allergies to bone and joint failure.  The lie is that asthma and allergies are considered derived from a genetic disposition.  So, doctors need not cure them.  Bad food equates to bad health and an academic paycheck to a doctor and pharmacist.  Planned obsolescence made medical. 

As a result, I have to find a nice way of telling people how to fix themselves for my sanity is what it comes down to.
       
                                                     

What Ever Happended to "Just the Right Thing to Do"

I feel cheap.  What ever happened to responsibility?  I got into republican politics because I knew it was the right thing to do.  But, as of late the powers that be feel they need to buy us to fill obligations.  I am offended.

I have always felt that I needed to do political things out of my own understanding and sense of right.  As of late, people that think they can buy me are running our local group.  They dangle bribes and incentives before the group to motivate us into using effort to do our responsibilities.  Boy they don't know me.  I am not a democrat.  I am moved by the purity of the cause.  Give me good ideals and true principals instead of the whitewashed game playing.  I am not a marketing toy.

I joined the republican party because they fit my ideals better not because I was treated to some gimmick or payment in return.  The establishment of rewards for effort take away my incentive to work.  I find the acquisition of money a poor cause for selling people crap even in business.

The people need to talk to representatives that support them not some money stream.  How democrat can we get; pay for a marketing campaign verses spreading understanding?

I feel that as a group our republican central committee has veered to the left side of the street.  I feel placated.
 
Our founding fathers knew that government starts at home and required 5 things to keep it going.  Faith, morality, law, education, and liberty are those 5 things.  After the home, we find these services provided first by churches.  The United States was specifically founded as a Christen country.

After home and church comes local precincts and the precinct chairmen (the only democratically elected politician in our republic).  The precinct chairmen vet all the other candidates all the way up to president.  The precinct chairmen hold the responsibility of vetting and submitting legislation to the state and federal legislatures as the people's needs require it.

However, this part of the equation is ignored as of late and the people's voice falls on deaf ears. Marketing based advertisements are tested and presented to us as if to sell the people a government full of toys and sweets.  Since when has a gingerbread house not ended with children being cast into the oven.  What have we done for our children?  What have we done to our children?

I am not cheap enough to sell my children and my grand children for a good advertising campaign.

It offends me hearing the word democracy used in politics as we (according to the Constitution) are not ruled by democracy.  We are ruled by a "Republic" and a set of laws.  I am ashamed to tell my precinct that we let them down.  That our local committee buys into the salesmanship filtering down from our greater socialistic government.  That "We the People" are pawns in the marketing of themselves and their children's lives to pay the debts of bad government policies.

Fixing this requires faithful moral people armed with natural law willing to educate freedom and liberate it to work.  A great man once stated "Teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves" (Joseph Smith).

The people are the power.  The Republic is the tool.  The Constitution is the rule,      

       

Our New Flag

Come November 7, 2012 we have a new flag over our nation.
 
I wouldn't be surprised to have it interpenetrated as "Obama leading the way out of America's blood smeared past"
 
I have seem my country all but destroyed.  It was bad pledging my allegiance seemingly to the law of the COLORs knowing that I was supporting Admiralty law against myself with this banner.  



Oh how we have offended our God by misusing his gift.  I am afraid we have sworn our posterity to slavery and captivity after the sacrifice of so much of our nations blood.  With tears on my cheeks I will not let Michelle Obama's words "All this for a damned flag" discourage me.

I will fight under one Flag, this one. 




Red Skelton's "Pledge of Allegiance"

John Wayne's "Pledge of Allegiance"

Paul Harvey's words of wisdom

I pray God has compassion on us as a people and forgives us our indifference as we let His free land and light upon a hill be all but extinguished.  When will we listen? When will we hear? When will "we the people" fight back?    

Our Founding Fathers created a country of the people.  It was a republic as the male land owners elected spokesmen to speak for their families in government.  Yet the people were balanced by the States in congress as the people had a voice in the House of Representatives and the States had a voice in the Senate.  People have a tendency to spend money on them selves.  The States where force to manage and budget money thus adopting a more conservative posture to preserve their status.

Money was printed by the FED but managed by the States, another check and balance.  The purpose of education was to teach children faith, morality, the law, and the means to understand the law.  The Churches where the first link in education as they taught Faith fostering morality.  The school system was to reenforce the Faith and add reading writing and the ability to do arithmetic so that law could be more readily understood.  Republics are maintained only by true understanding of the natural law of God.

Soon our Constitution's meaning was corrupted by the use of English common law as the base of interpretation instead of American common law known as "The law of nature and nature's God".  An example of this corruptions is found with the interpretation of the 14th Amendment.  According to natural law (Article 213, 214, and 215) if your father was Danish you are Danish even if you were born in the United States.  English law says otherwise.  I can see our founding fathers rolling in their graves as we adopt the very law they separated us from.

It gets worse.  Starting in 1913 and the ratifying of the 16th Amendment the United States was set on a course of slavery.  The 16th, 17th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th, 26th, and the 27th  Amendments to the Constitution have removed the people from the government as to enslave the people to prosper the global banking families.  Here is the scoop:

1. tax the people

2. make sure the States can't regulate the tax codes

3. make the women pay taxes too

4. speed up the process of getting good presidents out of office

5. setup a corporate government head

6. insurance and backup plan for removing a problem-sum president

7. get the 18 year old kids voting to dilute the voting pool and add emotion to reason

8. remove the last control the people had on politicians

nice job... NOT! to all you progressive politicians out there.

If you think you are free stop paying your taxes            

      

Gender and Politics

As an INTJ personality and a guy I can't help but to have an opinion on gender and politics. First Republicans are more rational and, Democrats are more emotional. So this splits the genders as more men are rational and non feeling. Moreover, more women are very feeling and less rational. Shopping centers know this. A guy has to be sold or need an item before he will set a foot in a store. Now gals rarely travel alone and aside from INTJ women enjoy shopping. (I find  INTJ women are not average women they make a lot more sense and being an INTJ man I find them predictable.  So, I married an ESFJ.  She is a challenging project that's always new.)

(note: I am assuming that the terms "men" and "males" are worthy of the titles, being grown rational beings, and not just boys.)   
 
But to the point. Women who are around real men are more apt to be conservative if not republican. Women left to their own feelings are more likely to be liberal or democrats. Additionally, "beautiful and male ego mastering" women are the women that attract men. A beautiful women like Tammy Bruce (former democrat now conservative) who doesn't use the male ego will not be as exposed to male pragmatism. Hence, unattractive women needs to have more of an understanding of the male ego and use the knowledge to attract men thus facilitating a potential development of trust in a man.

A woman that trusts a man is less likely to search for security in the government. Currently our education system teaches a very feminine curriculum. This stems from that 19^th Amendment. And in step, the term "General Welfare" in the Constitution has been twisted to mean "personal welfare" which ironically has taken husbandly and fatherly responsibilities from the boys trapping them as boys thus hurting the "General Welfare" of the nation. If it were not for women and men that stuck to traditional roles we would be farther down the road to anarchy.

A woman that accepts a role of wife and mother has more power then she thinks and far more then any business woman. As a wife and mother she touches the present with her husband and she touches the future with what she teaches her children.
 
Guys are like "Mechs" (big battling robots). They should have more strength, reason, and pragmatism then gals (give or take the application of self discipline). Guys are "warriors". Gals are the "cause". It use to amaze me how a woman could make a man do things he would not normally do. (The "male ego" is rooted in the male emotional center {what emotional center? you ask}. Males choose outside sources to influence them emotionally because they are emotionally inept compared to females) 
 
It's funny how kids are first open to mom and her sense of morality and emotion and then cross over to dad (as teenagers) for structure and relationship programming. Boys need to be taught morals before their strength develops (mom) and then they need to be taught self control and self discipline (dad). Girls need to be taught nurturing and understanding (mom) and relationship interaction (dad). Yes, we are responsible for our choices. That said, there is still a pheromone response to relationships. Dads supply the pheromones that their daughters need to slow development and build reason. If the pheromone is missing form lack of the father's presents; little girls develop faster. 
 
Later a young woman will be drawn to a guy that doesn't have similar pheromones to dad unless the "pill" is involved. Pheromones are an additional barrier between natural bothers and sisters restricting all but a platonic relationship. If the "pill" is in play she may pick a guy that when she wants to have kids will seem wrong (pheromones similar to dad's and brothers'). As if I haven't given it away yet, non matching pheromones make for more passionate marriages. Not being on the “pill” while dating is a big boost to staying married. 
 
Last point, men use a time-slicing thought processes. This gives them the ability to work one problem at a time to completion (or segment end for future use). Their brain runs on dopamine so it takes a lot more projects to stress them (that and they only see one project at a time). Males set boundaries by nature. 
 
Women use multitasking thought processes. This gives them the ability to work multiple time sensitive present problems at once. Their brain runs on oxytocin as a result ladies need down time to balance their brain chemistry (hence taking time to be nurtured and nurture others). Females honor boundaries by nature. 
 
So, I am fighting for my sons and I am attempting to weed out family weakening political agendas as the republicans are being inundated with boys and not men. I am fighting for my son's future wives and the moral leverage they can achieve by emotionally boosting my sons and raising moral kids. I am fighting for faith, morality, law, education, and liberty in this order as these are the principles that founded us a nation. I fight to re-instate the Constitution of the United States as the law on the land again and to bring back American common law. 
 
All politics start at home.

A Long Two Weeks

It has been said that in order for man to learn and grow he needs agency.  I find that agency is painful.  Two acquaintances of mine died in the last two weeks.  One from a selenium deficiency problem and the other from a radiation overdoes administered by an allopathic doctor known as chemotherapy.

I could argue that their poor use of agency caused their deaths but I know like with everything else this isn't that easy to classify and file.  How is this any different then catching a bullet or furnishing a speed bump for a car.  It isn't.  As I pondered on these situations I concluded that some of us are ready to leave life before others of us.  The method that gets used is really of little relevance.  Being mortal means we are an enemy to God as we are not "perfect" (a more appropriate translation from Greek; or "complete") ... as we can die and be separated from our bodies.  "Be ye therefore perfect even as your Father in Heaven is perfect" can also be more appropriately interpreted as "Be ye therefore complete even as your Father in Heaven is complete".  The monks translating didn't understand the ramification of the scriptural meaning of the Greek "complete" so they used "perfect" in its place.

Being "complete" means we need to find a wife and stay with her.  We need to have kids as the meaning of life is to give life.  Then we need to achieve the completeness of being fused body and spirit into one sole being.  This fusion (body and spirit "immortally") is one of the gifts from God found in the Atonement of His Son "The Christ".  As to building a family... we need to demonstrate our propensity for accepting this greatest blessing of all "Ever Lasting Life".

In the greater scheme of things, poor nutrition, bad politics, and death may be upon us in mortal life. However, God only cares about the spiritual condition of our individual hearts.  A man can posses all things but if he lacks charity... he is nothing.

I morn the loss of my friends but I believe they died as "complete (in this mortal state)" as they could. I just hope I did what I was needed to do without infringing on their agency with my opinoins.

As for me, I choose to live as long as I can (200 years-ish I understand is possible).  Granted I have to fix my nutrition, sleeping habits, and develop a few other things.  I think it would be fun to see my 4th and 5th generation kids if all things allow me.

       
           

World's End (as we know it)

The last few years have been full of struggle, stress, and the potential of doom and gloom.  As a result my thoughts have often drifted into a world of self reliance and the value of things in time of need.  The one thing I have not figured out is why buy gold, silver, or any money?  You can't eat it for food.  You can't burn it for warmth, give or take paper currency if you have enough of it.  The real wealth is in land... farm land and the seed, water, fertilizers, minerals, and ability to work it.

It's just like a rich man to go into the wilderness with a pocket full of gold to weigh him down.  Last time I looked the animals would not trade their meat for gold.  Plants will not feed you for gold.  However, if you master your surroundings and can apply some knowledge anything is possible.

I must confess I have thought this for a long time but I heard on "Coast to Coast AM" radio last night that I may not be off my rocker as far as I thought I was.           

Now the biggest enemies of self reliance are; the love of money, planned obsolescence, GMO crops, the FTC (Federal Trade Commission), the long haul shipping of food, and all government regulations and taxes imposed.  All of these things caused our short sightedness.

This is my reasoning.  Money is a placeholder for labor.  When you buy something it is the labor you are buying.  Everything starts with dirt and especially minerals.  The minerals are gathered and processed by hand or vegetation starting the labor stream that ends in products and services.  So we are buying organized dirt.  The price of which items is assigned according to the need of the product or service and the value of the perceived organization and construction.  This balancing of labor and market value creates a free market.  When money becomes more then a placeholder for labor as products and services become more refined, it transforms into a poison when people see it as an end (or magic power) without a connection to work done.  Money is then a poison for work to come.

Planned Obsolescence decreases the true value of labor by leading people away from the core elements of self reliance.  True self reliance is only possible if  people are able to live under their own hand or effort.  Planned Obsolescence is the equivalent of busy work.  It dumbs down the skill set of people to a few repetitive strokes with the intent of keeping people busy and unfocused on government.  This policy affords the limiting of personal "value added" decreasing the value of labor two ways.  The first, the people are compelled to sell their time at a fixed price even if the market is climbing.  Second, people are compelled to re-buy products wasting labor on redundancy as they lack the skills to avoid the expense.

GMO crops exacerbate the mineral deficiency diseases caused by poor soil conditions.  Remember everything comes from the dirt... even people.  We count on nutrition density form vegetation to feed our meat animals and our selves.  If we lack any of the 60 documented or 77 total bio-available minerals in our diet we suffer 1 or more of the 900 (plus) diseases associated with their absents.  GMO crops are designed to grow on fewer minerals then conventional crops.  They contain elements that bind with minerals to render "neutral" chemically and electronically active bio-available minerals.  GMO crops grow with fewer then the 9 minerals required for heirloom seeds.  This is way under the 60 humans and animals (food meat) need daily.

The FTC has in the past levied fines to farmers for growing their own cow feed crops.  Talk about a waste of stolen labor.  When a government compels people to pay taxes... they are stealing.  Taxes need be voluntary.   Fines, fees, licenses, and the like should never exist.  Where is the governments beneficial work?  They misinterpreted "General Welfare" in the Constitution to mean compete with the father's role in the family.  They force a tax burden reducing the incentive as fathers now have two yokes to pull.  They forced a situation where women have to find employment to aid in paying taxes.  In general the government as is has taken food away from people, gleaned it, and sent back the gleaning.  How are we supost to be happy with this?  How many people have real labor time to spend on their families?

Last, since I covered the government intrusions under the FTC, is the interstate and international trucking of food staples.  Removing a community's food production from the community destroys the community's infrastructure needed to feed the community if shipments of food are stopped.   

Untwisting this mess:

Well, the only way to untwist this mess is to fire the government for supporting the bankers running the world.