Dear Rush,
I listen to your show often. I agree with you loads. I don't like Obama's politics as I have lost 3/4ths of my food budget to his stupid egocentric kingship. Every time I hear of another executive order I want to puke; I get so sick to my stomach.
I am not an uninformed voter! In many ways I find my self more informed then most. This includes radio personalities. Of course, it doesn't take much to subdue liberal political rhetoric spewing hosts. But lately, I'm finding myself turning off conservative talk-show hosts.
I believe in free capitalistic markets, national defense, and The Constitutional Republic. I despise globalism, the misinformed educated astute, and THE CORPORATE DEMOCRACY.
The point of my letter... I am angry. As an INTJ personality type I can't handle a lot of stupid people especially when my food is their play thing. I want Obama impeached. I want the republicans to get the stick out of their butts and leave office as they have done nothing to warrant them staying. I want the Constitution back void of all "Obamanations" executive orders and every amendment after the 15th. I am financially poor sitting on resources I can't use because some "too big to fail guy" will get hurt. I can't wait for the final edict to fall on gardening with heirloom seeds. "Sir, you are going to jail for not growing scientifically designed inferior seed."
How many times has the FCC arrested some farmer for growing his own cow's chow because the government couldn't tax him out right. That violates the 4th amendment but... we wouldn't want the "too big to fail" "untaxed municipal government corporations" to fail, would we? In a heart beat.
Rush, I would like to get into it with you and health care. What's the deal with big pharmaceutical companies? Do you not have all the fact about health? Allopathic medicine is the most expensive medicine in the world. Yet, the U.S. rates 46th in the world as far as health. I would say our allopathic medicine is a "too big to fail business". Education, medicine, government, and agriculture all have a duplicity. If you don't separate the two forms you're just spewing irrelevance. The only thing that rubs my fur backwards faster is when a radio host, or anyone, can't put a complete idea together. Contiguous support... observations, reasoning to complete concept, and proper definition is how I understand things. People lose credibility if they mix their conclusions when the same operation model is used in different forms. Example: big business and big government use the same business model. So, both are wrong as both are interested in the bottom line of their government investments and not the citizen or customer.
Being financially challenged, I have had to jump through some pretty stupid hoops at times to get food. Having two systems, "one money grabbing and ineffective (current CORPORATE DEMOCRACY government and allopathic medicine)" and the other "effective but practically illegal (Constitutional Republic and Naturopathic medicine)", has slammed doors in my face because I will not sacrifice my kids to corporate communism.
I'm tired of having my hands tied for the good of the banksters (banker + gangster).
I know I sound like I am ranting on irrational matters attempting to find excuses to the ears of semi-educated people. However, I know that people only believe what the have experienced physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually for themselves. Lacking my curiosity driven attempt to find the root of all truth and reason combined with a top-down logical learning progression perception (plainly; one truth must agree and build on its predecessor while supporting any others to come). Truth is timeless. Truth is more solid if discovered by oneself. Unfortunately, lies and errors thwart the timid and irrational investigators.
Be it known that there is more to the story that I cannot divulge without injury to many others and myself. Income in the US is not based on real education. Communal necessity drives employment opportunities. Those that are perceived with low productivity ratios are the last to be employed. Real work security comes from integrity to a communal need often impeded by our government as of late.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Oh, bummer
In order to understand this post, you will need to over come the inner lizard brain response. (Time has past and I see now how this last line could be offensive. Oh well, I'm leaving it because I'm an INTJ and correct is better then sparing feelings. Just think of yourself as a doctor. The people mooning you are just getting shots.) Next we will need a clear definition of conservatism. Following this we need an understanding of "The law of nations or natural law". And, we will need an example of the law in motion "a poor interpretation of the 14th Amendment. After setting the foundation we can now develop the problem given to us in 1933. Which problem has rotted into a fine mess as depicted in "Thrive the Movie". Now the final note in this cacophony "The CORPORATE state of government". And for clarity this is how invasive the CORPORATE GOVERNMENT is now.
First! I am an entrepreneur and I am disappointed that I now have a
steeper rock to climb but, Romney would have only slowed the
progression to economic disaster not stopped it. Progressive republicans turning the
temperature up slowly on the pot of frogs, may have trapped more of
us in socialistic snares like the illegal ratification of the 16th Amendment and the 17th Amendment.
Conservatives educated with the United
States Constitution and nature’s law, not progressives catering to
democracy and crossing the isle, would have been more effective
during this election. Only the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has a democracy... a lawless corporate democracy. The
Constitution of the United States denotes a republic with laws.
(Side note; big media is part of the government corporate structure.)
In addition, you have to apply the
expensive bread analogy to the people on food stamps. When the price
of bread goes up people often buy less of a better bread to get their
monies worth. The same is true of the cost of employes. When the
cost of employes increases employers weed out all but the best
employees for keepers. No one likes buying expensive mediocrity. It doesn’t
balance the books. The best employees can keep up with the extra demand imposed by the new productivity level require to compete. Good to tolerable employees are just jobless. Of course, small businesses may have to let go of even the best employees to balance the books.
So, we should let the mediocre, poor,
and less educated starve since they are not prime candidates for the
business productivity index. As Obama squeezes his hand more of
these types of people will fall from his fingers. Small business
people will be some of the first to fall and many have. From talk radio
shows lately I find their anger at their own lack of education toward Romney
and Romney's lack of a real choice against Obama amusing. Even Rush
stated that fewer people turned out for this last election. This time
Obama received 11 million fewer votes than in 2008 and Romney received 2 million fewer then McCain did in 2008. McCain had Palin a conservative on the ticket. Romney was running as "only better then Obama".
I must admit though, I thought that
the bankers running the world would have chosen Romney to rebuild
more wealth for their taking but, it seems they are more worried
about 12/21/2012 or something. Leaving Obama in allows them to
push Agenda 21 on us sooner. Basically, Agenda 21 is world depopulation for better management of the remaining people. P.S. it started with abortions a few years back.
"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive" (Sir Walter Scott)
If we as a people, meaning all of us (black, white, yellow, and red), don't pull our heads out of our posteriors and fight back, Iceland will be the only sovereign nation left.
I just had an interesting thought. What if the fear of 12/21/2012 hooked with the money hidden in the governments' (note plural possessive) CAFRs brings an Icelandic response in the United States?
If Romney was more conservative like Reagan he would have been president now. However, I'm not sure if it would have been the best thing at this time.
The Cactus Cuties preforming the national anthem
Friday, November 2, 2012
Etiquette
Last night I was dreaming about an old client I no longer have. In the dream I was sitting across a very male decorated lawyer's desk facing the lawyer's secretary. Apparently, the lawyer had died recently and I was needed to complete some paperwork. In so doing I had an epiphany and I left the desk for a moment to check my hypothesis. Upon returning only moments later I was met with scorn. As an INTJ I found myself bewildered at the cold response when I returned.
Apparently, it is poor manners to test an hypothesis while interacting with someone else. It wasn't until I had cleared my train of thought and dedicated a few seconds to analyzing possible solutions to her reaction did I see a weak correlation between my action and her bewilderment and eventual anger.
Here is the part that worries me. I know that if I find myself in such a place again I will be blind sided and step into the same trap. Dream, this time, it was. However, I know I have provoked such responses in real interactions from people. I always felt at a loss as to why some people grew so hostile toward me.
I find so little satisfaction from being with others. I feel compelled to help others even though I find myself mostly met with indifference or hostility. One of my many sons is an ENFJ. He is always met with warmth and admiration from others. I have found it bewildering as he contributes little to actual measurable effort on their behalf. Even now my mind is contemplating the potential of others to interpret my words into hostile or less then fatherly ambitions. I am very pleased at my sons abilities... I just don't understand their nuance as I find people like wounded animals lashing out at their caregiver.
There are times I wish I had a different personality type. I get tired of being scratched and bitten or ignored for finding solutions. Yesterday, I agreed to talk to a preparedness group about computer safety and security. I took my ENTJ son with me as he can communicate with people more effectively then I can. By the end of the meeting the group seemed more comfortable addressing my son then me. Here again I am amazed at how fluid and honest he was without offending people. He was talking over their heads and yet he was more acceptable then I was.
I was informed of a new saying in the last few days "If you want to serve you must learn to sell and market". It seems that all business and service not only revolves around but are "marketing". I personally don't see this clearly. I don't buy things from advertising and marketing. I find such efforts wasted money and TV programming time. As I have need, I research solutions. A lot of times the solutions I find are contrary to popular belief. I don't trust doctors, engineers, politicians, bankers, or lawyers at face value without proof. A degree is not proof. Tangible results are proof only to a point. Sometimes short term results don't manifest a greater problem caused by a solution immediately. The use of fluoride in toothpaste falls into this group as fluoride causes brittle bones and teeth. But in the first six month period of exposure it kills bacteria in the mouth slowing tooth decay just to cause bone and tooth failure later.
One of the biggest lies out there now is "genetic disease". How is this a lie? I can cause or expound upon a mineral deficiency in the soil and cause a disease. For instance, make food plants that can metabolize manganese even in the presents of glyphosate. Now glyphosate binds to manganese rendering it inert so if you eat food (these plants) you will have a manganese deficiency which causes respiratory problems like asthma and allergies to bone and joint failure. The lie is that asthma and allergies are considered derived from a genetic disposition. So, doctors need not cure them. Bad food equates to bad health and an academic paycheck to a doctor and pharmacist. Planned obsolescence made medical.
As a result, I have to find a nice way of telling people how to fix themselves for my sanity is what it comes down to.
Apparently, it is poor manners to test an hypothesis while interacting with someone else. It wasn't until I had cleared my train of thought and dedicated a few seconds to analyzing possible solutions to her reaction did I see a weak correlation between my action and her bewilderment and eventual anger.
Here is the part that worries me. I know that if I find myself in such a place again I will be blind sided and step into the same trap. Dream, this time, it was. However, I know I have provoked such responses in real interactions from people. I always felt at a loss as to why some people grew so hostile toward me.
I find so little satisfaction from being with others. I feel compelled to help others even though I find myself mostly met with indifference or hostility. One of my many sons is an ENFJ. He is always met with warmth and admiration from others. I have found it bewildering as he contributes little to actual measurable effort on their behalf. Even now my mind is contemplating the potential of others to interpret my words into hostile or less then fatherly ambitions. I am very pleased at my sons abilities... I just don't understand their nuance as I find people like wounded animals lashing out at their caregiver.
There are times I wish I had a different personality type. I get tired of being scratched and bitten or ignored for finding solutions. Yesterday, I agreed to talk to a preparedness group about computer safety and security. I took my ENTJ son with me as he can communicate with people more effectively then I can. By the end of the meeting the group seemed more comfortable addressing my son then me. Here again I am amazed at how fluid and honest he was without offending people. He was talking over their heads and yet he was more acceptable then I was.
I was informed of a new saying in the last few days "If you want to serve you must learn to sell and market". It seems that all business and service not only revolves around but are "marketing". I personally don't see this clearly. I don't buy things from advertising and marketing. I find such efforts wasted money and TV programming time. As I have need, I research solutions. A lot of times the solutions I find are contrary to popular belief. I don't trust doctors, engineers, politicians, bankers, or lawyers at face value without proof. A degree is not proof. Tangible results are proof only to a point. Sometimes short term results don't manifest a greater problem caused by a solution immediately. The use of fluoride in toothpaste falls into this group as fluoride causes brittle bones and teeth. But in the first six month period of exposure it kills bacteria in the mouth slowing tooth decay just to cause bone and tooth failure later.
One of the biggest lies out there now is "genetic disease". How is this a lie? I can cause or expound upon a mineral deficiency in the soil and cause a disease. For instance, make food plants that can metabolize manganese even in the presents of glyphosate. Now glyphosate binds to manganese rendering it inert so if you eat food (these plants) you will have a manganese deficiency which causes respiratory problems like asthma and allergies to bone and joint failure. The lie is that asthma and allergies are considered derived from a genetic disposition. So, doctors need not cure them. Bad food equates to bad health and an academic paycheck to a doctor and pharmacist. Planned obsolescence made medical.
As a result, I have to find a nice way of telling people how to fix themselves for my sanity is what it comes down to.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
What Ever Happended to "Just the Right Thing to Do"
I feel cheap. What ever happened to responsibility? I got into republican politics because I knew it was the right thing to do. But, as of late the powers that be feel they need to buy us to fill obligations. I am offended.
I have always felt that I needed to do political things out of my own understanding and sense of right. As of late, people that think they can buy me are running our local group. They dangle bribes and incentives before the group to motivate us into using effort to do our responsibilities. Boy they don't know me. I am not a democrat. I am moved by the purity of the cause. Give me good ideals and true principals instead of the whitewashed game playing. I am not a marketing toy.
I joined the republican party because they fit my ideals better not because I was treated to some gimmick or payment in return. The establishment of rewards for effort take away my incentive to work. I find the acquisition of money a poor cause for selling people crap even in business.
The people need to talk to representatives that support them not some money stream. How democrat can we get; pay for a marketing campaign verses spreading understanding?
I feel that as a group our republican central committee has veered to the left side of the street. I feel placated.
Our founding fathers knew that government starts at home and required 5 things to keep it going. Faith, morality, law, education, and liberty are those 5 things. After the home, we find these services provided first by churches. The United States was specifically founded as a Christen country.
After home and church comes local precincts and the precinct chairmen (the only democratically elected politician in our republic). The precinct chairmen vet all the other candidates all the way up to president. The precinct chairmen hold the responsibility of vetting and submitting legislation to the state and federal legislatures as the people's needs require it.
However, this part of the equation is ignored as of late and the people's voice falls on deaf ears. Marketing based advertisements are tested and presented to us as if to sell the people a government full of toys and sweets. Since when has a gingerbread house not ended with children being cast into the oven. What have we done for our children? What have we done to our children?
I am not cheap enough to sell my children and my grand children for a good advertising campaign.
It offends me hearing the word democracy used in politics as we (according to the Constitution) are not ruled by democracy. We are ruled by a "Republic" and a set of laws. I am ashamed to tell my precinct that we let them down. That our local committee buys into the salesmanship filtering down from our greater socialistic government. That "We the People" are pawns in the marketing of themselves and their children's lives to pay the debts of bad government policies.
Fixing this requires faithful moral people armed with natural law willing to educate freedom and liberate it to work. A great man once stated "Teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves" (Joseph Smith).
The people are the power. The Republic is the tool. The Constitution is the rule,
I have always felt that I needed to do political things out of my own understanding and sense of right. As of late, people that think they can buy me are running our local group. They dangle bribes and incentives before the group to motivate us into using effort to do our responsibilities. Boy they don't know me. I am not a democrat. I am moved by the purity of the cause. Give me good ideals and true principals instead of the whitewashed game playing. I am not a marketing toy.
I joined the republican party because they fit my ideals better not because I was treated to some gimmick or payment in return. The establishment of rewards for effort take away my incentive to work. I find the acquisition of money a poor cause for selling people crap even in business.
The people need to talk to representatives that support them not some money stream. How democrat can we get; pay for a marketing campaign verses spreading understanding?
I feel that as a group our republican central committee has veered to the left side of the street. I feel placated.
Our founding fathers knew that government starts at home and required 5 things to keep it going. Faith, morality, law, education, and liberty are those 5 things. After the home, we find these services provided first by churches. The United States was specifically founded as a Christen country.
After home and church comes local precincts and the precinct chairmen (the only democratically elected politician in our republic). The precinct chairmen vet all the other candidates all the way up to president. The precinct chairmen hold the responsibility of vetting and submitting legislation to the state and federal legislatures as the people's needs require it.
However, this part of the equation is ignored as of late and the people's voice falls on deaf ears. Marketing based advertisements are tested and presented to us as if to sell the people a government full of toys and sweets. Since when has a gingerbread house not ended with children being cast into the oven. What have we done for our children? What have we done to our children?
I am not cheap enough to sell my children and my grand children for a good advertising campaign.
It offends me hearing the word democracy used in politics as we (according to the Constitution) are not ruled by democracy. We are ruled by a "Republic" and a set of laws. I am ashamed to tell my precinct that we let them down. That our local committee buys into the salesmanship filtering down from our greater socialistic government. That "We the People" are pawns in the marketing of themselves and their children's lives to pay the debts of bad government policies.
Fixing this requires faithful moral people armed with natural law willing to educate freedom and liberate it to work. A great man once stated "Teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves" (Joseph Smith).
The people are the power. The Republic is the tool. The Constitution is the rule,
Friday, October 5, 2012
Our New Flag
Come November 7, 2012 we have a new flag over our nation.
I wouldn't be surprised to have it interpenetrated as "Obama leading the way out of America's blood smeared past"
I have seem my country all but destroyed. It was bad pledging my allegiance seemingly to the law of the COLORs knowing that I was supporting Admiralty law against myself with this banner.
Oh how we have offended our God by misusing his gift. I am afraid we have sworn our posterity to slavery and captivity after the sacrifice of so much of our nations blood. With tears on my cheeks I will not let Michelle Obama's words "All this for a damned flag" discourage me.
I will fight under one Flag, this one.
Red Skelton's "Pledge of Allegiance"
John Wayne's "Pledge of Allegiance"
Paul Harvey's words of wisdom
I pray God has compassion on us as a people and forgives us our indifference as we let His free land and light upon a hill be all but extinguished. When will we listen? When will we hear? When will "we the people" fight back?
Our Founding Fathers created a country of the people. It was a republic as the male land owners elected spokesmen to speak for their families in government. Yet the people were balanced by the States in congress as the people had a voice in the House of Representatives and the States had a voice in the Senate. People have a tendency to spend money on them selves. The States where force to manage and budget money thus adopting a more conservative posture to preserve their status.
Money was printed by the FED but managed by the States, another check and balance. The purpose of education was to teach children faith, morality, the law, and the means to understand the law. The Churches where the first link in education as they taught Faith fostering morality. The school system was to reenforce the Faith and add reading writing and the ability to do arithmetic so that law could be more readily understood. Republics are maintained only by true understanding of the natural law of God.
Soon our Constitution's meaning was corrupted by the use of English common law as the base of interpretation instead of American common law known as "The law of nature and nature's God". An example of this corruptions is found with the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. According to natural law (Article 213, 214, and 215) if your father was Danish you are Danish even if you were born in the United States. English law says otherwise. I can see our founding fathers rolling in their graves as we adopt the very law they separated us from.
It gets worse. Starting in 1913 and the ratifying of the 16th Amendment the United States was set on a course of slavery. The 16th, 17th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th, 26th, and the 27th Amendments to the Constitution have removed the people from the government as to enslave the people to prosper the global banking families. Here is the scoop:
1. tax the people
2. make sure the States can't regulate the tax codes
3. make the women pay taxes too
4. speed up the process of getting good presidents out of office
5. setup a corporate government head
6. insurance and backup plan for removing a problem-sum president
7. get the 18 year old kids voting to dilute the voting pool and add emotion to reason
8. remove the last control the people had on politicians
nice job... NOT! to all you progressive politicians out there.
If you think you are free stop paying your taxes
I wouldn't be surprised to have it interpenetrated as "Obama leading the way out of America's blood smeared past"
I have seem my country all but destroyed. It was bad pledging my allegiance seemingly to the law of the COLORs knowing that I was supporting Admiralty law against myself with this banner.
Oh how we have offended our God by misusing his gift. I am afraid we have sworn our posterity to slavery and captivity after the sacrifice of so much of our nations blood. With tears on my cheeks I will not let Michelle Obama's words "All this for a damned flag" discourage me.
I will fight under one Flag, this one.
Red Skelton's "Pledge of Allegiance"
John Wayne's "Pledge of Allegiance"
Paul Harvey's words of wisdom
I pray God has compassion on us as a people and forgives us our indifference as we let His free land and light upon a hill be all but extinguished. When will we listen? When will we hear? When will "we the people" fight back?
Our Founding Fathers created a country of the people. It was a republic as the male land owners elected spokesmen to speak for their families in government. Yet the people were balanced by the States in congress as the people had a voice in the House of Representatives and the States had a voice in the Senate. People have a tendency to spend money on them selves. The States where force to manage and budget money thus adopting a more conservative posture to preserve their status.
Money was printed by the FED but managed by the States, another check and balance. The purpose of education was to teach children faith, morality, the law, and the means to understand the law. The Churches where the first link in education as they taught Faith fostering morality. The school system was to reenforce the Faith and add reading writing and the ability to do arithmetic so that law could be more readily understood. Republics are maintained only by true understanding of the natural law of God.
Soon our Constitution's meaning was corrupted by the use of English common law as the base of interpretation instead of American common law known as "The law of nature and nature's God". An example of this corruptions is found with the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. According to natural law (Article 213, 214, and 215) if your father was Danish you are Danish even if you were born in the United States. English law says otherwise. I can see our founding fathers rolling in their graves as we adopt the very law they separated us from.
It gets worse. Starting in 1913 and the ratifying of the 16th Amendment the United States was set on a course of slavery. The 16th, 17th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th, 26th, and the 27th Amendments to the Constitution have removed the people from the government as to enslave the people to prosper the global banking families. Here is the scoop:
1. tax the people
2. make sure the States can't regulate the tax codes
3. make the women pay taxes too
4. speed up the process of getting good presidents out of office
5. setup a corporate government head
6. insurance and backup plan for removing a problem-sum president
7. get the 18 year old kids voting to dilute the voting pool and add emotion to reason
8. remove the last control the people had on politicians
nice job... NOT! to all you progressive politicians out there.
If you think you are free stop paying your taxes
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Gender and Politics
As an INTJ personality and a guy I
can't help but to have an opinion on gender and politics. First
Republicans are more rational and, Democrats are more emotional. So
this splits the genders as more men are rational and non feeling.
Moreover, more women are very feeling and less rational. Shopping
centers know this. A guy has to be sold or need an item before he
will set a foot in a store. Now gals rarely travel alone and aside
from INTJ women enjoy shopping. (I find INTJ women are not average women they make a lot more sense and being an INTJ man I find them predictable. So, I married an ESFJ. She is a challenging project that's always new.)
(note: I am assuming that the terms "men" and "males" are worthy of the titles, being grown rational beings, and not just boys.)
But to the point. Women who are around real men are more apt to be conservative if not republican. Women left to their own feelings are more likely to be liberal or democrats. Additionally, "beautiful and male ego mastering" women are the women that attract men. A beautiful women like Tammy Bruce (former democrat now conservative) who doesn't use the male ego will not be as exposed to male pragmatism. Hence, unattractive women needs to have more of an understanding of the male ego and use the knowledge to attract men thus facilitating a potential development of trust in a man.
A woman that trusts a man is less likely to search for security in the government. Currently our education system teaches a very feminine curriculum. This stems from that 19th Amendment. And in step, the term "General Welfare" in the Constitution has been twisted to mean "personal welfare" which ironically has taken husbandly and fatherly responsibilities from the boys trapping them as boys thus hurting the "General Welfare" of the nation. If it were not for women and men that stuck to traditional roles we would be farther down the road to anarchy.
A woman that accepts a role of wife and mother has more power then she thinks and far more then any business woman. As a wife and mother she touches the present with her husband and she touches the future with what she teaches her children.
Guys are like "Mechs" (big battling robots). They should have more strength, reason, and pragmatism then gals (give or take the application of self discipline). Guys are "warriors". Gals are the "cause". It use to amaze me how a woman could make a man do things he would not normally do. (The "male ego" is rooted in the male emotional center {what emotional center? you ask}. Males choose outside sources to influence them emotionally because they are emotionally inept compared to females)
It's funny how kids are first open to mom and her sense of morality and emotion and then cross over to dad (as teenagers) for structure and relationship programming. Boys need to be taught morals before their strength develops (mom) and then they need to be taught self control and self discipline (dad). Girls need to be taught nurturing and understanding (mom) and relationship interaction (dad). Yes, we are responsible for our choices. That said, there is still a pheromone response to relationships. Dads supply the pheromones that their daughters need to slow development and build reason. If the pheromone is missing form lack of the father's presents; little girls develop faster.
Later a young woman will be drawn to a guy that doesn't have similar pheromones to dad unless the "pill" is involved. Pheromones are an additional barrier between natural bothers and sisters restricting all but a platonic relationship. If the "pill" is in play she may pick a guy that when she wants to have kids will seem wrong (pheromones similar to dad's and brothers'). As if I haven't given it away yet, non matching pheromones make for more passionate marriages. Not being on the “pill” while dating is a big boost to staying married.
Last point, men use a time-slicing thought processes. This gives them the ability to work one problem at a time to completion (or segment end for future use). Their brain runs on dopamine so it takes a lot more projects to stress them (that and they only see one project at a time). Males set boundaries by nature.
Women use multitasking thought processes. This gives them the ability to work multiple time sensitive present problems at once. Their brain runs on oxytocin as a result ladies need down time to balance their brain chemistry (hence taking time to be nurtured and nurture others). Females honor boundaries by nature.
So, I am fighting for my sons and I am attempting to weed out family weakening political agendas as the republicans are being inundated with boys and not men. I am fighting for my son's future wives and the moral leverage they can achieve by emotionally boosting my sons and raising moral kids. I am fighting for faith, morality, law, education, and liberty in this order as these are the principles that founded us a nation. I fight to re-instate the Constitution of the United States as the law on the land again and to bring back American common law.
All politics start at home.
(note: I am assuming that the terms "men" and "males" are worthy of the titles, being grown rational beings, and not just boys.)
But to the point. Women who are around real men are more apt to be conservative if not republican. Women left to their own feelings are more likely to be liberal or democrats. Additionally, "beautiful and male ego mastering" women are the women that attract men. A beautiful women like Tammy Bruce (former democrat now conservative) who doesn't use the male ego will not be as exposed to male pragmatism. Hence, unattractive women needs to have more of an understanding of the male ego and use the knowledge to attract men thus facilitating a potential development of trust in a man.
A woman that trusts a man is less likely to search for security in the government. Currently our education system teaches a very feminine curriculum. This stems from that 19th Amendment. And in step, the term "General Welfare" in the Constitution has been twisted to mean "personal welfare" which ironically has taken husbandly and fatherly responsibilities from the boys trapping them as boys thus hurting the "General Welfare" of the nation. If it were not for women and men that stuck to traditional roles we would be farther down the road to anarchy.
A woman that accepts a role of wife and mother has more power then she thinks and far more then any business woman. As a wife and mother she touches the present with her husband and she touches the future with what she teaches her children.
Guys are like "Mechs" (big battling robots). They should have more strength, reason, and pragmatism then gals (give or take the application of self discipline). Guys are "warriors". Gals are the "cause". It use to amaze me how a woman could make a man do things he would not normally do. (The "male ego" is rooted in the male emotional center {what emotional center? you ask}. Males choose outside sources to influence them emotionally because they are emotionally inept compared to females)
It's funny how kids are first open to mom and her sense of morality and emotion and then cross over to dad (as teenagers) for structure and relationship programming. Boys need to be taught morals before their strength develops (mom) and then they need to be taught self control and self discipline (dad). Girls need to be taught nurturing and understanding (mom) and relationship interaction (dad). Yes, we are responsible for our choices. That said, there is still a pheromone response to relationships. Dads supply the pheromones that their daughters need to slow development and build reason. If the pheromone is missing form lack of the father's presents; little girls develop faster.
Later a young woman will be drawn to a guy that doesn't have similar pheromones to dad unless the "pill" is involved. Pheromones are an additional barrier between natural bothers and sisters restricting all but a platonic relationship. If the "pill" is in play she may pick a guy that when she wants to have kids will seem wrong (pheromones similar to dad's and brothers'). As if I haven't given it away yet, non matching pheromones make for more passionate marriages. Not being on the “pill” while dating is a big boost to staying married.
Last point, men use a time-slicing thought processes. This gives them the ability to work one problem at a time to completion (or segment end for future use). Their brain runs on dopamine so it takes a lot more projects to stress them (that and they only see one project at a time). Males set boundaries by nature.
Women use multitasking thought processes. This gives them the ability to work multiple time sensitive present problems at once. Their brain runs on oxytocin as a result ladies need down time to balance their brain chemistry (hence taking time to be nurtured and nurture others). Females honor boundaries by nature.
So, I am fighting for my sons and I am attempting to weed out family weakening political agendas as the republicans are being inundated with boys and not men. I am fighting for my son's future wives and the moral leverage they can achieve by emotionally boosting my sons and raising moral kids. I am fighting for faith, morality, law, education, and liberty in this order as these are the principles that founded us a nation. I fight to re-instate the Constitution of the United States as the law on the land again and to bring back American common law.
All politics start at home.
A Long Two Weeks
It has been said that in order for man to learn and grow he needs agency. I find that agency is painful. Two acquaintances of mine died in the last two weeks. One from a selenium deficiency problem and the other from a radiation overdoes administered by an allopathic doctor known as chemotherapy.
I could argue that their poor use of agency caused their deaths but I know like with everything else this isn't that easy to classify and file. How is this any different then catching a bullet or furnishing a speed bump for a car. It isn't. As I pondered on these situations I concluded that some of us are ready to leave life before others of us. The method that gets used is really of little relevance. Being mortal means we are an enemy to God as we are not "perfect" (a more appropriate translation from Greek; or "complete") ... as we can die and be separated from our bodies. "Be ye therefore perfect even as your Father in Heaven is perfect" can also be more appropriately interpreted as "Be ye therefore complete even as your Father in Heaven is complete". The monks translating didn't understand the ramification of the scriptural meaning of the Greek "complete" so they used "perfect" in its place.
Being "complete" means we need to find a wife and stay with her. We need to have kids as the meaning of life is to give life. Then we need to achieve the completeness of being fused body and spirit into one sole being. This fusion (body and spirit "immortally") is one of the gifts from God found in the Atonement of His Son "The Christ". As to building a family... we need to demonstrate our propensity for accepting this greatest blessing of all "Ever Lasting Life".
In the greater scheme of things, poor nutrition, bad politics, and death may be upon us in mortal life. However, God only cares about the spiritual condition of our individual hearts. A man can posses all things but if he lacks charity... he is nothing.
I morn the loss of my friends but I believe they died as "complete (in this mortal state)" as they could. I just hope I did what I was needed to do without infringing on their agency with my opinoins.
As for me, I choose to live as long as I can (200 years-ish I understand is possible). Granted I have to fix my nutrition, sleeping habits, and develop a few other things. I think it would be fun to see my 4th and 5th generation kids if all things allow me.
I could argue that their poor use of agency caused their deaths but I know like with everything else this isn't that easy to classify and file. How is this any different then catching a bullet or furnishing a speed bump for a car. It isn't. As I pondered on these situations I concluded that some of us are ready to leave life before others of us. The method that gets used is really of little relevance. Being mortal means we are an enemy to God as we are not "perfect" (a more appropriate translation from Greek; or "complete") ... as we can die and be separated from our bodies. "Be ye therefore perfect even as your Father in Heaven is perfect" can also be more appropriately interpreted as "Be ye therefore complete even as your Father in Heaven is complete". The monks translating didn't understand the ramification of the scriptural meaning of the Greek "complete" so they used "perfect" in its place.
Being "complete" means we need to find a wife and stay with her. We need to have kids as the meaning of life is to give life. Then we need to achieve the completeness of being fused body and spirit into one sole being. This fusion (body and spirit "immortally") is one of the gifts from God found in the Atonement of His Son "The Christ". As to building a family... we need to demonstrate our propensity for accepting this greatest blessing of all "Ever Lasting Life".
In the greater scheme of things, poor nutrition, bad politics, and death may be upon us in mortal life. However, God only cares about the spiritual condition of our individual hearts. A man can posses all things but if he lacks charity... he is nothing.
I morn the loss of my friends but I believe they died as "complete (in this mortal state)" as they could. I just hope I did what I was needed to do without infringing on their agency with my opinoins.
As for me, I choose to live as long as I can (200 years-ish I understand is possible). Granted I have to fix my nutrition, sleeping habits, and develop a few other things. I think it would be fun to see my 4th and 5th generation kids if all things allow me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)