Monday, July 7, 2014

Man & Woman

As of late I have found myself in another debate with a woman that informed me that a woman's life is harder then a man's life... quaintly.  To which I have need of sacrificing sleep to set correct understanding.  For many years as a young man I was told I was dirt because I was privileged as a white man.  They eluded to a point that by birth my life was easy compared to everyone else.  As a man I don't have woman problems or by being white I don't have (fill in the blank) other problems.  If my life is so easy I missed something and I want my money back.

This isn't even the half of it.  As an INTJ and being perceived as being  unfeeling and disconnected from what real people think (oops) feel, I can't help but wonder what planet highly charged and information challenged people come from.  How can you be mad in ignorance unless you are just insane to begin with?

As to giving birth being so painful... there is only one man or woman other then the mother that can influence said pain and this person is the doctor.  I don't mean by drugs.  Any woman that trusts an allopathic doctor for birthing babies is going to have a harder time.  Allopathic medicine is just barley starting to give a vitamin pill to pregnant mothers.  A woman that wants a healthy baby and fewer pregnancy and birth pain complications will fix their nutrition 6 months before getting pregnant.  She will need 6 months of 90 essential nutrients daily to build up the stored of elements necessary to share her bones, muscle and fat with her baby.  If she has these extra stores not only will she look amazing as per getting pregnant, she will have (depending on her nutrient deficiencies) far fewer complications and pain in birth.  And for the big reveal, a well nourished woman will have far fewer difficulties getting well proportioned again (Obesity is a nutritional shortage).  Now for all the women I am about to alienate, how hard or soft child birth is is based on a lot of factors and me being male isn't one of them.  You have no right to tell me what is hard for you is harder then what I stumble on.

This one gets me too.  "I sacrificed my body to bring children into the world."  My response... yes you did especially if you listened to an allopathic doctor and didn't replenish your body's reserves and stores.

Ignorance on your part is not valid ground for arguing how difficult a woman's life is over mine.  I know what it is like to be lying on the ground as involuntary abdominal muscle cramps constrict hard enough to induce vomiting as kidney sand slowly and painfully gutted me over a week.  And this is the best part, pain is caused by ignorance and malnutrition.  If I where as informed then as I am now I would not have ever known this pain.

Hence, personal ignorance and stupidity cause pain.  Me being male didn't cause you any pain.

As to the other arguments of injustice induced by me being male upon women.  This is the epic cause for all male female injustice... we are not the same.  We are not physically, mentally, or emotionally equal.  This one is burning, I can feel the heat from here.  I can hear all the so called Ladies but, I didn't say anything about "my superiority" in reference to any of these three and sex.  Our perception of time is different altering the priority of activities as well as the focus we can achieve.  Our brain and body chemistry is different.

An orange and a banana line up at the start line for the big race.  The orange just starts rolling toward the finish line as the gun sparks to life.  The banana has to stand up on its back focusing on its balance as it rocks back and forth building up momentum.  Bananas have to roll stem to stern with enough force to jump the gap from the stern back to the stem.  Once this is achieved the circumference of the banana is greater then the oranges' however the orange sure does have a head start. 

Now the big question, which fruit is superior?  Which fruit represents which gender?  Well, women are oranges and men are bananas.

Women have an ambient pH lower then men (ask Secret (Strong enough for a man but made for a woman))
Women can roll any direction at any moment with their true multitasking minds.  Men need a clearer focus of the future's results to change direction with their time-slicing minds.
Women can work multiple unrelated tasks at once.  Men chop everything into small pieces and reassemble them as one linear task 
Women can roll over physical boundaries easier then men.  Meaning they can be overloaded easier then a man; they have no off switch being present tents thinkers.  Men are not able to be overwhelmed as easily; they have an off switch being future tents thinkers. 

This is my list of points of relevance when judging people
  1. Sex of person hence sex of the brain
  2. Personality type   
  3. Learning style
  4. Brain hemisphere dominance
  5. Age
  6. Morality
  7. Integrity
  8. Attitude
  9. Depth of Overall Knowledge
When I look at a person these are the things in which I see.  I cannot put a person in an uncomfortable position based on their own ignorance of their own being.  How's that for being Superior?  The upswing is formal education does little to convince me of any special talents.  I have met many book learned skulls of mush and I wondered how they walked.  They are easy to see.  They are quick to anger when life seems to drift from their image of reality.  And they are redundant.

The big scoop!  I have learned more in life through my trials and struggling then at any other time or institution.  I don't care what anyone thinks of passing their problems to me as I will not accept them.  If you need help or even to vent some I can help but! belly aching and attaching me for being white or male just makes for small minded weak people.

My advice is "Suck it up little camper! Work your own problems.  Quit attempting to blame others for your situation.  You are responsible for you!".   

Don't feed the monster!  Government is the monster as of late.  Crying to it may seem like a good idea now but soon it will turn on you also.  All governmental gifts where stolen first!  This is why the bigger the disaster is the more inept the government is.  If no one has anything... socialistic and fascist  politicians can get shot easily by over promising the hungry what they can no longer steal.  

Men and women are not equal nor should they try to be.  The hardest people to get along with are the ones we are most like.  I know my job I don't need my wife doing the same job.

Just think a whole world with only fry-cooks cause every body had to be the same.  Too bad we have no farmers to grow potatoes for fries.

Yes, fry-cook the lowest man on the fast food totem of which their are more fast food employees then any other profession.  Then we can all be diversified in uniform only instead of really playing to the strengths of our diversity.

Diversity and equal rights sure sound good if they weren't lies that bred malcontent and placed people in positions unsuited for their strengths.  Who am I to judge someones strength the white guy that had to fight for employment around government imposed quotas and lost.  I didn't have anyone to run to being what I am.

Friday, July 4, 2014

What I think of TEN healthy food substitutes

This is an attempt to understand how non INTJs see things.  I am comparing it to years of information I have gathered and tested dealing with my own health.  I concluded that I can't see any point in this exercise as I finished it.  I am not a non INTJ.  

I will be using this article as my source Please click here!

Starting with NUMBER ONE

Rice, popcorn, or edamame substituted for potato chips-

First, why are chips bad?  Dehydrated and concentrated carbohydrates coated with a free radical version of omega 6 fatty acid.  Carbohydrates are what fat is made of in our bodies and free radicals cause cancers.

Let's look at the substitutes Rice chips.  Do you see whats not listed on the ingredients list?  The method used to create a dehydrated carbohydrate again.  However oils are present so free radicals are a strong possibility still.  Popcorn chips a dehydrated carbohydrate in a free radical again.  And  edamame (fried soybeans) Let's not forget this treat.  Ninety percent of U.S. soybeans are GMO.  Ok, a GMO in a free radical... What could be healthier? 

Well, if we followed substitution ONE we would still get fat and get cancer.

A real substitute would be a baked potato with real unpasteurized butter, salt, chives, and a dab of real unpasteurized sour cream.  Why?  No burnt or dehydrated carbohydrates overload, no cancer causing free radicals, digestible fats for nerve and cell membrane repair, living probiotics with ample enzymes to aid digestion, and it requires time to eat with chewing preparing the body for food and it's complete absorption.

One last problem with common logic here... fats and oils are not the source of human weight gain.  The bodies inability to process carbohydrates due to mineral deficiency is what causes weight gain.       

NUMBER TWO

Vanilla yogurt substituted for Non-dairy topping-

Let's see, Non-dairy topping is a free radical combined with a GMO or cancer with a side order of birth defects.

Ok, vanilla yogurt... the trick here is that most flavored yogurt is pudding not living yogurt or basically food starch.  If you do find an actual yogurt, note that when flavor and sugar is added to yogurt the sugar (being a natural antibiotic)* kills the good bacteria culture in the yogurt.  And, pasteurization fuses the fat and minerals (calcium) in dairy products together forming soap.                

(*note sugar kills good bacteria in our digestive tract and leaves the Candida fungus causing intestinal yeast overgrowth in large quantities.)

Solution real unpasteurized cream whipped with cane sugar, genuine vanilla bean extract, and a dash of cream of tarter.

Also note that low fat diets lead to dry skin, nerve damage, artery damage, poor joint lubrication, and Alzheimer's diseaseNeed some saturated animal fat? 

NUMBER THREE

 Bagels for doughnuts-

High carbohydrate low fat or high carbohydrate burnt fat let's see weigh gain with brain disease or weight gain with cancer... really?

Ok, I'll have a medium rare steak with butter.

NUMBER FOUR

Whole gain pasta for pasta-

High carbohydrate low fat or high carbohydrate?  Weigh gain with brain disease or weight gain, I hear an echo

NUMBER FIVE

Low fat or vegetarian sausage for beef or pork sausage-

Brain damage and cancer or brain damage and deliberate nutritional deficiency in place of only cancer what a choice! 

NUMBER SIX

Dry chicken meat for fried chicken meat-

Brain damage with protein for cancer with protein, not much of an improvement here.

Solution- slow cooked chicken (bones and skin on) with potatoes, peas, and carrots served with fresh creamy butter.

NUMBER SEVEN 

Real cheese for fake cheese food-

Ok. I admit it they got one right.  Nothing beats real food plus all 77 minerals.

NUMBER EIGHT

Small french fry for large french fry-

Really?  How about a tall glass of cool water and a salt shaker?  I usually eat salty food when I am thirsty.

NUMBER NINE

Whole grain bread for white bread-

Two carbohydrates, what a choice we have here.  I am trying to resist but, I can't.  Here are two articles grain people might show interest. #1  #2      

NUMBER TEN

Brown rice crackers for fried wontons-

Like so many of these comparisons I find them equally bad mismatches.  I have found that eating good fat fixes a lot of ills.  Sometimes eating bad fats relieve pain to a point (fried wontons) but, malnutrition and starvation (brown rice crackers) do neither.

I don't see the point in this article.  If I were normal it would be another bad fat gaining experience for me.  I may even think it was my fault instead of bad information.  Lucky I am me and know better.  

Saturday, May 17, 2014

Organized Religion

It is funny, my son has had some questions about supporting an organized religion.  Until he posed the question I had never considered looking at a more fundamental point so directly.  Well, following my own advice I will reduce the question to simplest terms and build from there.

Order and Ciaos, do we really understand these two words?  Do we recognize them as opposites?  I realize that I am a Mormon or a member of "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints" so some of the concepts I use expand into realms beyond Earth life.  From the "Pearl of Great Price" we learn that life existed before the "Big Bang" or any thing that we know of mortality.  We learn that the true building block of all things is Intelligence.  What if life really began when two Intelligences, less then what is required for an idea, began to oscillate to the mutual benefit of one other.  From the sea of intelligences in ciaos, order arose.  This puts a new spin on Organized Religion not to mention when religion was first organized.

Now, suppose that like with other things and sciences there are plateaus and paradigm shifts.  For example electrons.  Electrical Charge was discovered and studied.  Soon uses for charge where introduced in steps and focused to the point that "Texting", "Youtube", and I-phones are now the norms.                       
What if Order has been going through the same metamorphosis?  Ordered Intelligence forms thought.  Thoughts form ideas.  Ideas form reason.  Reason forms purpose.  Purpose forms drive.  Drive forms ambition, passion, and spirit.  Step by step the level of Order increases.  Even our physical form is an organization of far smaller particles of  temporal energy.  Intelligence to spirit to matter how we have progressed.  By integrity to order we have and do exist.

The integrity that maintains order down to the intelligence level of existence is the Priesthood.  There is only one Priesthood that binds all order together as a result it is not man made or controlled by man.  Man is just another paradigm shift in the ordering of intelligence.  Even though man did not create nor dose he control the Priesthood, he must be found holding it though obedience and integrity to eternal law to continue evolving.

Now back to organized religion.  Some have told me that they can best worship God from a creek in the mountains hip deep fly fishing on Sunday.  Each of us enjoy our own pleasures at God's hand and we should be full of gratitude even when we lose a fish, hook our ear casting, or we slip and fall in the creek filling our waders full of water for the walk home.  Is gratitude the only element of worshiping God?  Dose tending to selfish interests really demonstrate a reverence to God?

Let us look at just the beginning of the ten commandments paraphrased.

1. "Thou shalt have no other Gods before me"- are we worshiping God when we show no obedience or integrity for eternal law?  Dose this not establish our ambition as our new God?

2. "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself"- are we "over looking" or "looking over" the needs of those around us?       

Scrooge just popped into my mind.  The line "... let me keep Christmas in my our way" and the retort "But you do not keep Christmas" and the reply "Then let me leave it alone then".     

The second commandment is a compelling reason alone to participate in an organized religion.  One man can do good however his "man hours" are limited to 24 hours a day give or take recouping strength.  In that same day, two organized men have 48 hours and then it really starts to multiply as others with like minds collect in that same day.                              
   
How many unorganized or disorganized companies exist in America at present?  How much money do they make for their stock holders?  What services or products do they provide for us?  Hey, if unorganized religion is so good then unorganized business should be great also.

What about unorganized crime?  I bet that unorganized crime would be a winner.  Just think, pot heads and johns would have a harder time finding on-demand recreation.  It would be a lot cheaper too.

So, if caught in a disaster who is going to help us?  unorganized crime or organized crime?  Probably neither.  Unorganized business?  I like unicorns too.  Organized business?  For a price.  Government?  Government can only give what it takes from others.  The bigger the disaster the less effective government is.  How about unorganized religion?  So, you like unicorns too?  Who would have people, resources, and stores at no cost?  Who may have a network of money, food, housing, supplies, and counseling for hurt and suffering people for themselves and others as temporarily needed?  Who loves his neighbor as himself putting God as number one?

Before we answer this last set of questions a distinction must be made.  There are businesses masquerading as churches.  Often the difference is how they collect and use money.  Is the clergy paid well?  Are people willing to improve themselves... hailed or shunned?

All things on the table, there is only one way to worship God and that is with a true Organized Religion.   More?  

Doctrine and Covenants 109:8
 Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing, and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God;

Friday, April 4, 2014

Global Warming... Hoax?

So which is it hoax or not? This is where it gets complicated.  Yes and no, yes conventionally it is a hoax but in reality the truth is not what most would expect.  For starters, common man is not causing that much damage to the environment.  However, the US Government is culpable.  The project is called "Geo-engineering".   Agenda 21 chapter 9 through chapter 22 states that it is the governments' (plural possessive) responsibilities to learn to control the environment of the world.  America under President Bush, President Clinton, President Bush and now President Obama fully support Agenda 21.
          
Considering Agenda 21 is all about killing 6 billion people globally to reduce the population to 500 million (a sustainable global number) it is hard to believe the US government is working against the people.  I was shocked to see all the plans made to this end.

So is global warming a hoax?  As it is presented YES! it is.  However, geo-engineering is not a hoax and if there is global warming it maybe the cause.  In a nutshell planes spry bio-available aluminum, other metals, and toxins into the air.  You have seen them making crisscross  patterns in the sky that get puffier and fuller until clouds appear.  Then ripple patterns and vortexes form in the clouds as microwave radiation bombards them changing temperatures and eventually causes the jet stream to change as desired.

So global warming is a hoax but the earth has been bombarded with so much pollution from geo-engineering that it is killing the algae in the oceans.  This kill off has increased the methane levels in the atmosphere as the algae decays.  More over the bio-available aluminum binds with ozone decreasing the ozone layer.  Notice how the sky is milky blue as of late?  Aluminum Oxide is not as deep blue or protective from the sun as pure ozone is.

There are ways to stop this earth kill but you have to believe it is happening first.  Isn't there something in the bible about Satan gently and quietly lulling people down to Hell?                  

Why Do I Listen To Rush Limbaugh?

I avoid most news outlets but I do listen to Rush once in a while.  Every time, I get angry.  The funny thing is I'm not mad at Rush.  I am mad at all the bigotry, onesidedness, and hate mongering of the socialist left wing hetero-phobic agenda.

I have never seem a more mean spirited people then the hetero-phobic.  What can you expect?  They can't naturally bread according to Charles Darwin.  Two men can't naturally make a baby any more then two woman can.

Marriage was designed to track the posterity conceived in the marriage bed.  What is conceived in a hetero-phobic bed?  How anti-God can you get?  God gave Adam and Eve the commandment to "Multiply and Replenish the Earth".  Masturbating with like company can't get this job done.

Now as an INTJ my curiosity of both the male and female bodies is great but my respect for God is greater.  His plan is "way cooler" (oops, I'm dating myself) then my fascination to be immoral.  I like having children and I am looking forward to grandchildren.  My fascination with bodies like mine is not a substitute to having kids.

What was done to Brendon Eich is a sin and angers me enough to reconsider using Firefox ever again.  I realize that the only way hetero-phobic people reproduce is by the indoctrination of others.  This is why hetero-phoebes are in our face all the time weeding out the weak and convincing their captives that they are hetero-phoebes also.  Gee, a plan for societal death not unlike the "Plan for Sustainable Development".  What is it like to be a tool in the hands of the "Great Deceiver"?

Please people! God gave us agency.  If you choose to fornicate with an age appropriate and consenting member of your own or opposing gender in the privacy of your own house I don't care.  Just stay out of my face.  Leave my kids alone.  Remember, the level of intimacy we share with another is not marriage, our children's well being is what marriage is about. 
                        

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Candida

Here it is I can't add any more.

Well, they changed the page on me.  So, nutshell version.  Candida is a normal body fungus that eats dead waste in our bodies that probiotics can't glean from any longer.  It is a balanced system of nutrient releasing gut flora and gut cleaning fungus.  However, if we eat foods that have anti-biotic properties in large quantities we kill off the probiotics in our gut flora leaving only the fungus which doesn't liberate nutrition.  Sugar is the worst anti-biotic of all because of how it kills bacteria.  It act like 2-4-D on dandelions.  It is a super fertilizer that creates unsustainable pro-biotic growth causing bacteria starvation and large quantities of fungus food.  Candida feasts when high levels of sugar are in the gut.

Carbohydrates and sugar are not essential food to maintain life but they can make nice love handles



          

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Limbaugh, Liberals, SUVs, and Real Science

Real gas mileage has little to do with the speed, size, weight, and the aerodynamics of a car or truck.  Current gas mileage is based on the car's fuel injection system's design and the volume of it's cylinders.  The bigger the cylinders the more noncombustible fuel can be stored during ignition for the catalytic converter to burn.

I would have thought that the tree hugging liberals would get wise to this fact if CO, CO2, NO, NO2, NO3, and hydrocarbons, not to mention the sulfides from the catalytic converter, were so dangerous.  I would have thought that common everyday conservatives would get tired of being taxed per piston revolution on gasoline that they are just passing from their tank to the ground with no contributing power to momentum.  To borrow a line from Jessica Rabbit pertaining to the SUVs, "they're not bad they're just designed that way".  Mr. Limbaugh, as to the fact that liberals stand for all non-rational things, they are naive and just being used to drive up gasoline and fuel prices but, I think you know that...  At least the bottom rung liberals.

The Current Truth About Engines

In the current combustion systems design, gasoline is mixed with MTBE which lowers its volatility and power output.  MTBE is heavier then gasoline so the 14:1 ratio of air to fuel seems to be maintained.  The atomized fuel is detonated up to 10 degrees before the piston is at top center.  (top center is where volume if the cylinder is at it's smallest point.)  This compresses the fuel and air forcing the fuel into a more liquid state.  (Compressed gasses often turn to liquid.)  Liquid gasoline won't burn; there is no oxygen in it to burn it.  The spark plug fires at 10 degree's to top center.  (This heats the fuel forcing the surface of the fuel and the air to start to burn lending energy to vaporize more of the fuel.)  (note this also adds reverse torque to the engine robbing power.)  After clearing top center the fuel expands and mixes with what small portion of oxygen is in the air.  Expanding and burning gasses force the piston down the cylinder as the fuel continues burning past the bottom of the stroke.  At this point the fuel is compressed by the piston and the expanding gasses are forced back into a liquid form to extinguish the remaining unburnt hydrocarbons.  These wasted hydrocarbons are then sent to the catalytic converter to be converted to less explosive forms.

It doesn't mater if the car is big or small it consumes too much fuel.  If the stoichiometric equation was really balanced there would be no need of a catalytic converters or hydrocarbons left in the exhaust.  The remaining substances after running an engine would consist only of CO2 and H2O.  That said let's move on to what real science says about engines.

The Real Science About Engines

First engines are air pumps not fuel burners.  The proper stoichiometric equation for white gasoline is 200:1 (200 parts air to 1 part gasoline) for maximum power.  Translated to horse power that would be 24,000 to 30,000 horses to the wheels (70-80 miles to the gallon) depending on the resistance of the drive chain and engine.  So the speed, size, weight, and the aerodynamics of a vehicle mean nothing to fuel economy.  (Conventional muscle car's have between 200-450 horses to the wheels and 8-15 miles to the gallon.)

From where cometh the horsepower?  Well let's inject premixed white gasoline vapor with air at a ratio of 500:1 so we don't break anything.  It is detonated at 3 degrees past top center.  Even compressed for better atomic contact the vaporized premixed fuel and air remains in a gaseous form.  A 6 millisecond pop burns all of the mixture and smacks the piston to the bottom of the cylinder.  Since heat is absorbed in the developing vacuum the cooled cylinder at the end of the down stroke creates a small vacuum that starts that piston back up the other side of the stroke.  There is no fuel attempting to expand against the returning piston

The best parts, very little fuel was used (good for conservatives).  The fuel that was used was all converted to CO2 and H2O (good for tree hugging liberals).  Now, who is this bad for?  Well... THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and global bankers.  Gas taxes dry up.  The people are unencumbered by expensive travel.  Shipping prices drop like rain.  Less reason to raise minimum wage.  Agenda 21 policies get tossed in the wind of our speeding transportation.  Geo-engineers will have to spray more toxic crap in the air to compensate for the decrease in airborne hydrocarbons.     

A air fuel ratio of 500:1 is about 250 to 300 miles per gallon at 1,200 to 3,200 horse power at the wheels.  Without all the smog pumps, catalytic converters, and anti-population gear, the car is lighter to boot. 

More Real Science

Crude oil can be manufactured in the backyard in a process called "Thermal Depolymerization" with a pressure cooker.  Gasoline is a renewable resource.  It can be made from table scraps and plastic garbage.

If these sociopathic politicrats and politicans don't get their banking brought back in country and reinstate the Constitution of the United States (including the original 13th Amendment) they may be surprised at the technology the common people possess.

There is no reason an SUV should get less then 220 miles per gallon and have 4 time the horsepower they currently have running gasoline all the time contributing to healthy plants.  "Real Science"

The government energy labs like to give science shows in the community often around here. They attempt to encourage kids to take science classes.  In the last demonstration I attended the professor had three balloons full of gasses.  The first was hydrogen.  The second was methane.  The last was a 1/4th mixture of methane and 3/4ths air.  Each balloon was tied to a string and suspended according to its buoyancy.  Hydrogen floats.  Methane is heavier.  As the demonstration progressed a blow torch was used to detonate the balloons.  The hydrogen balloon popped with attitude.  The methane balloon popped louder with a fire ball.  The premixed methane (after being warned to put our fingers in our ears and remove the babies) detonated with little visible fire but it rattled all the windows in the warehouse and shook the concrete floor on which we were standing.

Oh, to get down to the horsepower of conventional muscle cars using white gasoline vapor the ratio is 1,000 to 1 (1,000 parts air to 1 part gasoline).  So if 0.0001 parts gas is running the car what is the other 99.9999% percent of the gas doing?  Well, maybe...  Some of the gas was replaced by additives?  What's left is used to heat up the engine?  Pollute the engine oil? Add counter torque?  AND... Dump toxic gasses and unburned hydrocarbon into the air?  This might be done to guarantee a steady and constant money stream for the government.  Even now the gas price is probably being driven up to cover the lack of people working (decrease in demand) while maintaining governmental taxes.  Our gasoline exports kind of give this impression.  But I know I'm just being cynical.